A few posts ago I wrote a recipe wherein the ingredient came first and was followed by the amount. A few of you commented that this was a refreshing way to look at and follow a recipe. I agree. As do a lot of professional chefs. The most common reason for this is that it's easier, visually, to increase a recipe to the right. At Citizen Cake we had many pages in our binders where the initial size of the recipe had become obsolete and we had to increase items by 10 or 25 times!
In large scale baking there are some ingredients which cannot or should not be increased exponentially. Baking powder is one of them. Salt can be another. A chocolate chip cookie mixed by hand is a very different beast from one that occupies an 80 Quart Hobart mixer. When creaming butter and sugar for a cookie it's usually important not to add air to the mixture and this cannot be completely avoided when the paddle attachment is almost as tall as you are and weighs as much as an IBM Selectric typewriter.
Recently at a Baker's Dozen meeting for those authors who had recently come out with cookbooks a very good point was made by a great baker. She reminded us all that in order for recipes in a cookbook to be tested and re-tested, the publishing company has to sink more money into this facet. (Outside recipe testers are paid to test in their own home kitchens.) Not all publishing houses are created equal and some recipes are edited without care for continuity. As one writer put it bluntly, the author is charged for every "extra" word.
In professional kitchens recipes are usually just a list of ingredients and their amounts, (if they're typed up at all---a rarity). With much savory food the chef tells you what they want in telegram-type speech.
"Blonde chick stock. Necks too. Mirepoix. Leek tops only. Overnight."
Baking is usually a little more complicated and precise but not all pastry chefs want to give away their coveted recipes. At Citizen Cake our binders were fairly thorough in description, but they stayed on the premises. I spent a lot of time in the office putting dates on the updated recipes. Even if you are just cooking/baking at home for your own personal pleasure, this is a really good idea. I always say that it takes a few times to really "get it right." And how better to make changes but with notes about what you did last time? In the Zuni Cafe Cookbook Judy Rodgers strongly implores her readers to do this-- make the items more than a few times to really be able to capture the essence of her methods and recipes.
I have said this before: a recipe is a guide. When you know a little about baking you can start changing ingredients. For example, canola oil cannot be substituted for butter, but agar-agar can be substituted for gelatin if you understand that agar-agar is a much stronger gelling agent and it drastically alters the structure of the gelled substance. This is why "alternative baking" completely astounds me! If pastry chefs are the neurologists of the kitchen, as Anthony Bourdain astutely points out in Kitchen Confidential, then vegan bakers are the neuro-surgeon-nuclear-physicists!
If your recipe is written like this:
Sugar 1 Cup
Egg Whites: 1/2 Cup
Cream of Tartar 1/4 teaspoon
it's very easy to increase it. And more importantly: be able to check your math! Almost every recipe disaster is because the math is wrong. Shorthand is also very helpful, even if it is only you who understands it. Some pointers:
t: is always teaspoon
T: is always tablespoon
C: is always cup
#: pound
BP: baking powder
s & p: salt and pepper
yox: egg yolks
evo: extra virgin olive oil
And if you are channeling your inner Virgo, a great way to arrange your recipes is to start with the same ingredients for products that are related. Most (Western) cookies start with butter, sugar, salt, eggs, flour + leaveners, ending with add-ins. The "creaming method" always begins with butter and sugar. And then there's the shorthand for the dry-wet-dry-wet-dry method: d,w,d,w,d. Cakes with liquid ingredients oftentimes employ this as batter can easily break when the emulsion process is tenuous. These are some of the ways you will begin to intuit the methods and percentages that all recipes work from. And from here you can make the leaps into your own recipe writing.
This is really interesting. You have given me quite a bit to think about. I may be reorganizing my old notebooks.
Posted by: lindy | 29 November 2005 at 10:00 AM
Very interesting! I want more...
Posted by: ilva | 29 November 2005 at 02:37 PM
Good stuff, Shuna. My books are filled with sticky notes with variations and discoveries and suggestions for next time.
When were you at CC? I was lucky enough to write a review, back in 2003, for the dreaded Fangxaminer. I had a couple of great meals. (And desserts!)
Posted by: cookiecrumb | 29 November 2005 at 06:49 PM
i remember in culinary school, one of the instructor's recipes contained the obscure (to us) "BTAB." after several minutes of literally scratching our heads, we figured it out. bring to a boil.
oh, and don't forget 10x for powdered sugar.
Posted by: dexygus | 29 November 2005 at 11:48 PM
This is really interesting to read and of course makes a lot of sense :) thanks
Posted by: helen | 30 November 2005 at 01:54 AM
Shuna, this is such a service! I had never thought of it this way, because all the cookbooks had such a standard format for decades. But this way of putting together a recipe makes perfect sense to me. And just in time for me, because I'm trying to nail down a gluten-free sugar cookie recipe for the holidays. (And thanks for putting that link to me in the post!) Of course, I never worked in a professional kitchen. But I almost feel as though I do, now that I'm laying out ideas for other people. I just don't shout and talk in shorthand.
once again, you astound me.
Posted by: shauna | 30 November 2005 at 09:45 AM
Fantastic post! You seem to have a real gift! Please, MORE!
Posted by: Melissa | 01 December 2005 at 12:32 AM
Superb Shuna! Scaling is becoming an art form for me, so I appreciate your thoughts on the subject.
Oh, and indulge me this little guffaw! Isn't that evoo? LOL!
Posted by: chronicler | 02 December 2005 at 08:40 PM
As I now write and develop recipes to earn my pennies, I can really relate to this piece. Shuna can vouch that I am one of the few savory chefs that developed and wrote actual recipes; wanted the food to be consistent and having recipes, that were always adjusted if necessary for taste, helped my crew.
Funny anecdote; recently a chef for our company called me at 7am to ask about one the recipes I wrote; "Is a 1 cup serving size an 8oz cup?" I was silent and stunned. "What else could it be?"
I thought. A tea cup? coffee cup? (then I got silly--jock cup? bra cup?) Yes, I responded. Still makes me giggle.
Posted by: Jennifer | 03 December 2005 at 07:23 AM
a really eye-opening write up for me. its really sort of a revelation like why-didn't-we-think-of-that! i would be converted from now on. thanks
Posted by: rokh | 04 December 2005 at 08:03 AM
My eyes stopped reading after Citizen Cake, I was remembering my great dessert there years ago.
Posted by: Randi | 06 December 2005 at 08:48 PM
I was looking for new ways to present a recipe on my food blog and came across your page on google search.
Very helpful with some neat tips and thanks for sharing. Your suggestion of writing down the ingredients first and then the measurements sounds good to me.
Posted by: Indira | 10 May 2006 at 10:53 PM
Really interesting. Thanks. I just finished a cookbook for my brother and his new wife, and I wish I'd read this yesterday before it went to the "printer" instead of today. Oh well. Maybe someone else will get married!
Posted by: maggie | 08 December 2006 at 11:46 AM
As a student teacher I was just given a task of recipe writing. I need to write a lesson plan and deliver it to a class of 10-yo.
Your writing is really helpful.
I was thinking about to make a toufu salad at site and let student record the steps.
Now I have something more.
Thank you!
Posted by: Flora | 10 March 2007 at 04:35 AM